- HQ
- London
- Fee
- Free
Swiss sustainable digital bank. Clients steered to Alpian.
Tap a star to jump to reviews
Five questions
Is it a bank?
Yes — Bank (via parent stack) (FINMA). Still read the entity on the statement.
If it fails?
Was esisuisse-eligible via the banking stack
Salary?
Not listed. An IBAN or sort code is not automatically a salary account.
Open from abroad?
Residency and KYC are gated. An App Store listing is not proof you can onboard.
Monthly fee
Was subscription-based
Account number
No IBAN-class local rail on this file.
Licence first · score second
6.4
/10 · Mixed
Graveyard. The lesson is Switzerland’s digital-bank carrying cost.
radicant tried to be a sustainable Swiss digital bank. In 2025 it wound down and pointed clients at Alpian. It is the cleanest recent example of a well-intentioned Swiss neobank colliding with a small, expensive market.
Best for: Historical — Swiss sustainable banking case study.
Last checked 2026-08-01. Not advice.
Closed 2025-06
Wound down; clients directed toward Alpian. Swiss home market too small for a fourth green bank.
Who holds the money
Licence first
Was esisuisse-eligible via the banking stack
No dated notes yet. When the licence, fees, or status moves, it lands here.
Straight answers
radicant is filed as Bank (via parent stack). The named regulator is FINMA. Still read the entity on the statement before you send money.
radicant is closed. Cover, while it existed, sat in the Swiss banking stack (esisuisse), not a fintech wrapper.
The monthly fee on this file is Was subscription-based. Fees change — open the operator's pricing page if it is linked.
No published user reviews yet. The NeoBankDB score still comes from licence, fees, and the product — not from an empty star average.
News20 Jun 2025 · 3 min
radicant’s clients were pointed at Alpian. The Swiss page gets shorter again.
Read the noteNote18 May 2026 · 7 min
FINMA does not play. The home market is small. A fourth payments app is a hobby, not a bank.
Read the note